Cabinet Philippe ALLIAUME

Avocat à la Cour d'appel de Paris

Ruling no 212 of 18 March 2021 (17-20.226) – Cour de cassation (Court of Cassation) – Second Civil Chamber – ECLI:FR:CCAS:2021:C200212 – Equivalence in national law of a social benefit obtained from another Member State under the Article 5 of Regulation EC No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 april 2004 : application of the terms and conditions specified by the CJEU in response to the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Read More

Ruling no 155 of 17 February 2021 (19-24.780) – Cour de cassation (Court of Cassation) – First Civil Chamber – ECLI:FR:CCASS:2021:C100155 – Freedom of expression and right to respect for private life : balancing these rights under the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights – The recall of a criminal conviction, even if pronounced publicly, is likely infringing private life. Referral through a hypertext link of an obituary already published on another website does not exclude the existence of an infringement of privacy.

Read More

Ruling no 886 of 24 September 2020 (18-12.593 ; 18-13.726) – Cour de cassation (Court of Cassation) – Second Civil Chamber -ECLI:FR:CCAS:2020:C200886 – The provisions of Article L. 124-1-1 of the Insurance Code devoted to claims aggregation are not applicable to liability incurred by a professional in the case of breach of the duties to inform and advise, this, which is individual in nature, excluding the existence of a technical cause, within the meaning of this text, allowing them to be considered a unique damaging event.

Read More

Chronique CEDH : la Cour encadre l’interception en masse des communications

Comme on pouvait s’y attendre, les mois de mai et juin 2021 ont permis à la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme de développer sa jurisprudence covid-19. Cependant, la période aura été davantage marquée par d’importants arrêts relatifs à l’interception en masse des communications, aux violences domestiques, aux traitements inhumains ou dégradants au droit à l’oubli, à la discrimination et comme toujours, à la liberté d’expression. D’intéressantes incursions en droit du sport ou en droit électoral. La Cour de Strasbourg a continué à creuser des sillons jurisprudentiels auxquels font écho des arrêts que l’on pourrait qualifier de régressifs.

en lire plus